Email this article Prediction of Computer Type Using Benchmark Scores of Hardware Units
Abstract
Users need an expert opinion to learn about their current computer or purchasing. In addition to these, computer and computer component manufacturers have to carry out innovation studies such as improving the products they produce by receiving feedback about the products they produce, and changing the marketing strategy. There is various benchmark software to meet all these needs. This benchmark software measures the software and hardware performance of the computers and enable users to gain information about the performance of their computers and components. The category of computers can also be determined as a result of the performance evaluation obtained. Various statistical and machine learning methods are used to determine these categories. In this study, it is tried to predict which category the computers fall into by using the computer features in a dataset obtained from the internet by the web scraping method by random forest and logistic regression method. The effect of computer features in the dataset on classification has been analyzed. Classification success was 89.4% with the random forest method and 84.3% with the logistic regression method.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Saavedra, R.H. and A.J. Smith, Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 1996. 14(4): p. 344-384.
Simon, J. and J.-M. Wierum. Performance Prediction of Benchmark Programs for Massively Parallel Architecture. in 10th Annual Intl. Conf. on High-Performance Computer HPCS. 1996.
Okulicka-Dluzewska, F. High-performance computing in geomechanics by a parallel finite element approach. in International Workshop on Applied Parallel Computing. 2000. Springer.
Sibai, F.N., Performance analysis and workload characterization of the 3dmark05 benchmark on modern parallel computer platforms. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 2007. 35(3): p. 44-52.
Che, S., et al. Rodinia: A benchmark suite for heterogeneous computing. in 2009 IEEE international symposium on workload characterization (IISWC). 2009. Ieee.
Kuznetsov, E. and V. Klimanov. Evaluation of the Performance of Information and Computer Systems. in 2019 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon). 2019. IEEE.
Carvalho, P., et al., Kernel concurrency opportunities based on GPU benchmarks characterization. Cluster Computing, 2020. 23(1): p. 177-188.
Volz, V., et al. Single-and multi-objective game-benchmark for evolutionary algorithms. in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 2019.
Saxena, P. and J. Chou, How much Solid State Drive can improve the performance of Hadoop cluster? Performance evaluation of Hadoop on SSD and HDD. International Journal of Modern Communication Technologies and Research, 2014. 2(5): p. 265794.
Rizvi, S.S. and T.-S. Chung. Flash SSD vs HDD: High performance oriented modern embedded and multimedia storage systems. in 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology. 2010. IEEE.
Saeed, K. and G. Raja. Performance evaluation of modern broadwell architecture of a parallel & distributed microprocessor. in 2017 International Symposium on Wireless Systems and Networks (ISWSN). 2017. IEEE.
Kumar, S. and P. Singh. An overview of modern cache memory and performance analysis of replacement policies. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICETECH). 2016. IEEE.
https://www.userbenchmark.com/. 2020 [cited 2020 07.04.2020]; Available from: https://www.userbenchmark.com/.
Thomas, D.M. and S. Mathur. Data Analysis by Web Scraping using Python. in 2019 3rd International conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA). 2019. IEEE.
Cinar, I., M. Koklu, and S. Tasdemir, Classification of Raisin Grains Using Machine Vision and Artificial Intelligence Methods. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi (GMBD). 6(3): p. 200-209.
Shaikhina, T., et al., Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2019. 52: p. 456-462.
Breiman, L., Random forests. Machine learning, 2001. 45(1): p. 5-32.
Cruyff, M.J., et al., A review of regression procedures for randomized response data, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, the proportional odds model and item response model, and self-protective responses, in Handbook of Statistics. 2016, Elsevier. p. 287-315.
Kalantar, B., et al., Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2018. 9(1): p. 49-69.
Donel, B., Yapay Sinir Ağları Yöntemiyle Kredi Skorlama. 2012, Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü ….
Pietraszek, J., et al. The fuzzy approach to assessment of ANOVA results. in International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence. 2016. Springer.
Sokolova, M., N. Japkowicz, and S. Szpakowicz, Beyond Accuracy, F-Score and ROC: A Family of Discriminant Measures for Performance Evaluation. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2006: p. 1015-1021.
Luque, A., et al., The impact of class imbalance in classification performance metrics based on the binary confusion matrix Pattern Recognition 2019: p. 216-231.
Kannan, R. and V. Vasanthi, Machine learning algorithms with ROC curve for predicting and diagnosing the heart disease, in Soft Computing and Medical Bioinformatics. 2019, Springer. p. 63-72.
Kaya, E., A. Yasar, and I. Saritas, Banknote classification using artificial neural network approach. training, 2015. 10: p. 1.
Koklu, M. and I.A. Ozkan, Multiclass classification of dry beans using computer vision and machine learning techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020. 174: p. 105507.
Tümer, A.E. and S. Edebali, Modeling of trivalent chromium sorption onto commercial resins by artificial neural network. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2019. 33(4): p. 349-360.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstracting and indexing
