Email this article A review of the usability of photogrammetry technique for studying the structural behavior of historical buildings
Abstract
The structural integrity and performance of historical buildings are important factors in their survival for generations. There are many research and development in the examination of structural behavior of historical buildings, with technological developments that allow innovative techniques spread very rapidly in design and construction practice. Conventional surveying techniques that still exist in practice are replaced with their enhanced digital counterparts for more accuracy in measuring structural deformation. As one of the novel techniques, photogrammetry provides 3D digital models out of high-quality images which define the level of detail in preservation and documentation projects. Especially in numerical modeling of historical buildings, it is required to ensure a certain level of accuracy in the digitization of complex geometrical and material properties, for which photogrammetry provides easy-to-use, inexpensive and time-saving solutions. In the context of studying cultural heritage, which possess unique architectural and cultural values, it is essential to examine structural and seismic behavior of historical buildings and monuments. Within this context, it is highly important to conceive new methods that integrate the monitoring processes of structural behaviors of historical buildings and innovative technologies. The purpose of this research is to demonstrate the advantages in the use of photogrammetry for studying the structural behavior of historical buildings, which fills an important research gap in the field. The study provides an extensive review of the literature that focuses on the use of photogrammetry by classifying the works according to the headings of “topic,” “methodology,” “site,” and “findings.” One of the findings is that there is a limited number of works that attempt to integrate the use of photogrammetry with structural analysis. Despite the confirmed effectiveness of the method, it is found out that there are four studies that focus on photogrammetry to conduct structural analysis. With the increased use of photogrammetry that is computationally inexpensive and timesaving, it will be advantageous for researchers, engineers and surveyors who work on taking important decisions about the preservation of historical buildings. Besides, the research shows the potential of the technology of photogrammetry as a holistic approach for bringing together the disciplines of architecture and engineering that usually require two distinct expertise in terms of analyzing the structural behavior of historical buildings under static and dynamic loads.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Ulvi, “Importance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in the Documentatıon of Cultural Heritage,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, 4(3), pp. 104-112, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.637050
İ. Şanlıoğlu, M. Zeybek, and G. Karauğuz, “Photogrammetric Survey and 3D Modeling of Ivriz Rock Relief in Late Hittite Era,” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 13(2), 2013.
Y. Kaya, A.Y. Yiğit, A. Ulvi, and M. Yakar, “Arkeolojik Alanların Dokümantasyonununda Fotogrametrik Tekniklerinin Doğruluklarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: Konya Yunuslar Örneği,” Harita Dergisi, 165, pp. 57-72, 2021.
A. Alptekin, M.Ö. Çelik, and M. Yakar, “Anıtmezarın yersel lazer tarayıcı kullanarak 3B modellenmesi,” Turkey Lidar Journal, 1(1), pp. 1-4, 2019.
M. Yakar, and H.M. Yılmaz, “Kültürel Miraslardan Tarihi Horozluhan’ın Fotogrametrik Rölöve Çalışması Ve 3 Boyutlu Modellenmesi,” Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 23(2), pp. 25-33, 2008.
İ. Kılıç, K.B. Bozdoğan, S. Aydın, S.G. Gök, and S. Gündoğan, “Kule tipi yapıların dinamik davranışının belirlenmesi: Kırklareli Hızırbey Camii minaresi örneği,” Journal of Polytechnic, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.481857
M. Vatan, “Yığma Yapıların Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemine Dayalı Analiz Modelinin Oluşturulmasında Fotogrametrik Verilerin Kullanılması,” Master thesis, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, 2005.
A.İ.Ünay, Tarihi Yapıların Depreme Dayanımı, Ankara: ODTÜ Publishing, 2002.
E. Mele, and A. De Luca, “Behaviour and modelling of masonry church buildings in seismic regions,” WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 41, 1970.
A. Koçak, “Tarihi yapıların statik ve dinamik yükler altında lineer ve non-lineer analizi: Küçük Ayasofya Camii örneği,” Ph.D. dissertation, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, 1999.
H. Bilgin,“Mimar Sinan Yapılarında Kubbeli Örtü Sistemlerinin Yapısal Analizi,” Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 21(3-4), pp. 119-128, 2006.
V. Öztaş, “Yığma yapıların güçlendirilmesi ve bir yığma yapı örneğinde güçlendirme analizi,” Master thesis, İstanbul Technical University, 2009.
B. Kucukdogan, J. Kubin, and A.İ.Unay, “Seismic assessment of monastery of stoudios (Imrahor Mosque) in İstanbul,” In Advanced Materials Research, 133, pp. 721-726, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.721
B. Ş. Şeker, “Mimar Sinan camilerinin statik ve dinamik yükler etkisinde davranışlarının incelenmesi,” Ph.D. dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 2011.
K. Korkmaz, P. Zabin, A. Çarhoğlu, and A. Nuhoğlu, “Rize Merkez Kurşunlu Camisi’nin deprem davranışının incelenmesi,” Sakarya University Journal of Science, 18(3), pp. 149-156, 2014.
M. Çavuş, and Ş. Sözen, “Çelik payandalarla güçlendirilmiş Tokat Deveci Hanı’nın sismik analizi,” Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 20(2), pp. 347-360, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.468491
H. Ä. Erdoğan, “Türk minarelerinin sonlu elemanlar analizi yöntemiyle deprem performanslarının karşılaştırılması,” Ph.D. dissertation, Selçuk University, Konya, 2018.
İ.O. Yazgan, and A.İ. Ünay, “Bursa, Yenişehir Sinan Paşa Külliyesi İmaretinin Sayisal Modellenmesi ve Yapisal Analizi,” Nigde Omer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 8(2), pp. 1193-1203, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.598235
A. Gönül, and G.B. Sakcalı, “Tarihi Irgandı köprüsünün deprem performansı,” International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (5ICEES), Ankara, 2019.
Z.Y. İlerisoy and A. Soyluk “Dynamic analysis of Dolmabahce masonary clock tower,” Gradevinar, 65(4), pp. 345-352, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.885.2012
M.E. Stavroulaki, G.A. Drosopoulos, E. Tavlopoulou, N. Skoutelis, and G.E. Stavroulakis, “Investigation of the structural behaviour of a masonry castle by considering the actual damage,” International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation, 3(1), pp. 1-33, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMRI.2018.089046
A. Brencich, and D. Sabia, “Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge,” Construction and Building Materials, 22(10), pp. 2087-2099, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.031
M. Kujawa, I. Lubowiecka, and C. Szymczak, “Finite element modelling of a historic church structure in the context of a masonry damage analysis,” Engineering Failure Analysis, 107, 104233, 2020.
H., Can, J. Kubin, and A.İ. Ünay, “Seismic behavior of historical masonry buildings with irregular geometry,” Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27(3), 2021.
V. Barrile, G.M. Meduri, and G. Bilotta, “Comparison between two methods for monitoring deformation with laser scanner,” WSEAS Transactions on Signal Processing, 10(1), pp. 497-503, 2014.
L. Klein, N. Li, and B. Becerik-Gerber, “Imaged-based verification of as-built documentation of operational buildings,” Automation in construction, 21, pp. 161-171, 2012.
A. Bhatla, S.Y. Choe, O. Fierro, and F. Leite, “Evaluation of accuracy of as-built 3D modeling from photos taken by handheld digital cameras,” Automation in construction, 28, pp. 116-127, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.06.003
L. Barazzetti, G. Forlani, F. Remondino, R. Roncella, and M. Scaioni, “Experiences and achievements in automated image sequence orientation for close-range photogrammetric projects,” Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XI, 8085, pp. 160-172, 2011.
H.İ. Şenol, A.Y. Yiğit, Y. Kaya, and A. Ulvi “İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik veri füzyonu ile kültürel mirasın 3 boyutlu (3B) modelleme uygulaması: Kanlıdivane Örneği,” Turkish Journal of Photogrammetry, 3(1), pp. 29-36, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.935920
G.E. Symon, and C.E. Cassell, Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide, Sage Publications Ltd, 1998.
V. Barrile, G. Bilotta, E. D’Amore, G.M. Meduri, and S. Trovato, “Structural modeling of a historic castle using close range photogrammetry,” International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 10, pp. 370-380, 2016.
F. Micelli, A. Cascardi, and M.A. Aiello, “Seismic capacity estimation of a masonry bell-tower with verticality imperfection detected by a drone-assisted survey,” Infrastructures, 5(9), pp. 72, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5090072
M. Korumaz, M. Betti, A. Conti, G. Tucci, G. Bartoli, V. Bonora, ... and L. Fiorini, “An integrated Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS), Deviation Analysis (DA) and Finite Element (FE) approach for health assessment of historical structures. A minaret case study,” Engineering Structures, 153, pp. 224-238, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.026
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstracting and indexing
